国产躁逼免费一区|国产精品—色呦呦|亚洲男女999果|亚洲一区二区日本|台湾色佬中文娱乐|国产最强孕妇在线播放|在线观看一区超碰|强奷1区2区3区|精品久久久久不卡|欧美成人二区三区

  • 法律圖書館

  • 新法規(guī)速遞

  • 中國農(nóng)村合作化運動及其解體 (The Collectivizationa and De-collectivization in Rural China)

    [ 周大勇 ]——(2004-1-2) / 已閱29801次


    brief conclusion
    Looking closely at the institution, an important lesson might be learned. Currently, the goals of equality or equity are still outstandingly important. Thus, an effective reform strategy in China in the current environment must satisfy these norm and then seek efficiency incrementally. Otherwise, it is unlikely that any reform approach or process can succeed. The clarification of land as one of significant property rights has confirmed to be still at an early stage. So far farmers have only insufficient property rights, or we can say that peasants' property rights based of land is still unstable, it is corroded by the current system itself. What’s more, peasants cannot get compensation for their contribution even if they choose to leave or no longer active in their village. Peasants suffer from inevitable low efficiency but they find no way to change the reality. At same time, surplus agricultural labor continues to grow in villages, slowing down the progress of rural industrialization and urbanization, which are still the aim of Chinese reform.
    Since the inadequacy of property rights encumbers the rural reform process, further clarification of land rights will undoubtedly be a key issue. Although this question is still very controversial and disputed, if there will be no essential change, it is likely that the rural development process in China will continue to be frustrated and might result in a new round crisis in rural China.

    Reference:
    1,Lin, J.Y. Institutional reforms and dynamics of agricultural growth in China. Xinhua Press. 1997
    2, Reisch, E. Land reform policy in China: Political guidelines Center for Agricultural Publishing, Wageningen, Netherlands. 1992
    3, Lin, J. Collectivization and China’s Agricultural Crisis in 1959-1961, Journal of Political Economy, No. 98. 1990
    4, Tan, Q. The Origin of Collective Township and Village Enterprises in China, Chinese Economic History, Vol. 2. 1999
    5, Zhou, Q, Rural Reform in China: The Change of Relationship between the State and Ownership, Chinese Social Sciences Quarterly, Vol.8. 1994
    6, Chen, K., G. Jefferson Lessons from China’s Economic Reform, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 16, 1992
    7, www.liv.ac.uk/history
    8, www.dfat.gov.au/publications/catalogue
    9, www.rcre.org.cn/
    10, www.chinacountry.com/
    11, intellectual.members.easyspace.com/danggy/on%20rural%20collective%20property.htm
    12, www.cp.org.cn/pool/bsjj.htm
    13, www.aweb.com.cn/nw/zt/
    14, http://www.1upinfo.com/country-guide-study/china/
    15, http://www.newint.org/concept3/profile.htm

    總共2頁  [1] 2

    上一頁  

    ==========================================

    免責(zé)聲明:
    聲明:本論文由《法律圖書館》網(wǎng)站收藏,
    僅供學(xué)術(shù)研究參考使用,
    版權(quán)為原作者所有,未經(jīng)作者同意,不得轉(zhuǎn)載。

    ==========================================

    論文分類

    A 法學(xué)理論

    C 國家法、憲法

    E 行政法

    F 刑法

    H 民法

    I 商法

    J 經(jīng)濟法

    N 訴訟法

    S 司法制度

    T 國際法


    Copyright © 1999-2021 法律圖書館

    .

    .